Modified: 13.08.2009
Kuikkapuro - Gold Database
|
|
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Kuikkapuro | DATA UPDATED | 18.1.2008 | |||
| Alternative names | Kuikka | |||||
| Deposit summary | KUIKKAPURO, in the Suomussalmi greenstone belt, has an in situ resource estimate of 800 kg gold, with an average grade of 14.6 g/t Au (unclear if the resource calculation is JORC-compliant). It is an Archaean orogenic gold deposit in tholeiitic metabasalt in a second-order, D3 to D4, NNW-trending, lithology-parallel, ductile shear zone. Alteration mineral assemblages (biotite-calcite) indicate mineralisation under amphibolite-facies conditions. Coarse, free native gold in quartz veins and their immediate, intensely biotitised host rock. | |||||
| LOCATION | ||||||
| Geological domain | Archaean | Belt | Suomussalmi | |||
| Site photo |
|
Regional map |
|
|||
| Map sheet | 451110 | |||||
| Northing (kkj) | 7228710 | Easting (kkj) | 4455850 | |||
| Latitude | 65.15171N | Longitude | 29.05530E | |||
| Municipality | Suomussalmi | |||||
| Nearest town, roads | 27 km N from Suomussalmi, 5 km from sealed road, a gravel road to the area. | |||||
| MINING | ||||||
| Exploration licence no | 6748/1–4, 6841/1, 6880/1–2, 6912/1 | Mining concession no | ||||
| Present holder | OPEN FOR ACQUISITION | |||||
| Previous holders | Geological Survey of Finland (GTK) (1996–2001), Outokumpu Oyj (2001–2003), Polar Mining (2003–2006) | |||||
| Infra fig 1 |
|
Infra fig 2 | ||||
| Claim fig 1 |
|
Claim fig 2 | ||||
| Mine photo 1 | Mine photo 2 | |||||
| Mine photo 3 | Mine photo 4 | |||||
| Status of development | Prospect | |||||
| When mined | ||||||
| Resources | 0.054 Mt @ 14.6 ppm Au [4,5]. | |||||
| Deposit size (Mt) | 0.054 | Reference (size) | [4,5] | |||
| Total in-situ gold (kg) | 800 | Reference (in-situ Au) | [4,5] | |||
| Total gold production (kg) | Reference (gold prod) | |||||
| Production of other metals | ||||||
| Extent of mineralisation | 1 km long, 15–30 m wide, dips at 60° to the ENE [4,5]. | |||||
| Lodes | At least one lode [1]. | |||||
| Best sections | 0.7 m @ 183 ppm, 1 m @ 115 ppm, 16 m @ 19.0 ppm, 1 m @ 54 ppm, 3 m @ 11.4 ppm, 2 m @ 26.2 ppm, 4.4 m @ 8.6 ppm, 6.8 m @ 1.8 ppm Au [4,5]. | |||||
| EXPLORATION | ||||||
| Discovery year | 1997 | |||||
| Discovery | By GTK: first indications were a regional Au anomaly in till and an auriferous sample from a glacial erratic boulder, provided by an amateur prospector; further indications were the high Au, As and Te concentrations detected by percussion drilling into till-bedrock interface; the deposit was detected by drilling by GTK: the first hole intersected ore [1,4,5]. | |||||
| Exploration history | GTK (1994–1999) [1,4,5,7,10]: Bedrock mapping, till
geochemical survey, percussion drilling into till-bedrock interface, diamond drilling, low-altitude
airborne magnetic, electromagnetic and radiometric survey, and magnetic, slingram and IP ground
survey, structural and ore mineralogy studies.
Outokumpu (2001–2002) [10]: palaeo-stress modelling. |
|||||
| Section figure 1 |
|
Plan figure 1 |
|
|||
| Section figure 2 | Plan figure 2 |
|
||||
| Section figure 3 | Plan figure 3 |
|
||||
| Section figure 4 | Plan figure 4 |
|
||||
| Trench fig 1 |
|
Trench fig 4 | ||||
| Trench fig 2 |
|
Trench fig 5 | ||||
| Trench fig 3 |
|
Trench fig 6 | ||||
| Explor site photo 1 | Explor site photo 2 |
|
||||
| Geophysical response | IP indicated the pyrite-rich horizons and ground-magnetic survey possible shear or fault zones; no specific response by slingram [4]. | |||||
| Drilling | GTK (1996–1999) [4,5,7]: 52 diamond-drill holes, total 4359 m. | |||||
| Elements analysed | All samples by ICP-AES for As, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, P, Pb, S, Sb, Sr, Ti, V and Zn; in addition Ag, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn by AAS, Au and Te by GFAAS; Al, As, Ba, Bi, Ca, Ce, Cl, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, La, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Nb, Ni, P, Pb, Rb, S, Sb, Sc, Si, Sn, Sr, Th, Ti, U, V, Y, Zn, Zr by XRF [4,5]. | |||||
| Primary dispersion | Au and As anomalies; however, Au and As do not show a strong positive correlation with each other [7], but in [10] it is stated that gold shows a positive correlation with As and Te. | |||||
| Secondary dispersion | Extensive Au-Te anomaly in till [7]. | |||||
| Primary anomaly fig 1 |
|
Secondary anomaly fig 1 |
|
|||
| Primary anomaly fig 2 |
|
Secondary anomaly fig 2 |
|
|||
| Primary anomaly fig 3 |
|
Secondary anomaly fig 3 |
|
|||
| Primary anomaly fig 4 |
|
Secondary anomaly fig 4 | ||||
| Primary anomaly fig 5 | Secondary anomaly fig 5 | |||||
| Economic evaluations | ||||||
| Exploration geologist in charge | GTK: Kimmo Pietikäinen; Outokumpu: Jukka Jokela | |||||
| ORE | ||||||
| Siting of gold | Free gold in quartz veins, closely associted with arsenopyrite, grain size up to one millimetre [1,4], but on average 10-30 μm [10]. Highest Au content is in quartz veins immediately below hanging wall [7]. | |||||
| Fineness | 84.3–89.4% Au, 10.1–14.6% Ag [4]. | |||||
| Major opaques | Arsenopyrite, pyrite, pyrrhotite [4]. | |||||
| Minor opaques | Ilmenite, chalcopyrite, pyrite, bravoite, pentlandite, cobaltite, sphalerite, galena, molybdenite, löllingite, covellite, talnakhite, native gold, wolframite, zincian chrome spinel, stibiopalladinite, altaite, hessite, petzite, sylvanite, tsumoite, volynskite [10]. | |||||
| Gangue | Quartz, biotite, K feldspar, epidote, scheelite [4,10]. | |||||
| Ore miner. photo 1 |
|
Ore miner. photo 5 | ||||
| Ore miner. photo 2 |
|
Ore miner. photo 6 | ||||
| Ore miner. photo 3 |
|
Ore outcrop photo 1 | ||||
| Ore miner. photo 4 | Ore outcrop photo 2 | |||||
| Ore composition | ||||||
| Enriched elements | Deduced in reference [10] from mineral assemblages (mass balance not evaluated): Ag, Al, As, Au, Ba, Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ni, CO2, K, P, Pb, S, Si, Sr, Te, Ti, V, W. | |||||
| Ore fluid | ||||||
| Stable isotopes | ||||||
| Pb isotope data | ||||||
| GEOLOGY | ||||||
| Geological setting | The deposit is in the southern part of the late Archaean Suomussalmi Greenstone Belt and is in the rocks of the 2.8-2.7 Ga(?) Saarikylä Group of the greenstone belt [1,3,10]. It is in a sequence dominated by mafic and intermediate metavolcanic rocks (occasionally pillowed mafic lavas and intermediate to mafic tuffs or tuffites) with minor metakomatiitic units, in a contact zone between mafic and intermediate to felsic units, in an overturned antiform [4,8,10]. | |||||
| Major host rocks | Tholeiitic basalt [4]. | |||||
| Minor host rocks | ||||||
| Intrusives | [1,2,3]: TTG granitoids, from 2739±8 Ma to 2697±10 Ma of age, are abundant within and near the greenstone belt. The alteration halo is cut by an unaltered dolerite dike, which resembles dykes of a Proterozoic dyke swarm cutting the greenstones of the Suomussalmi Greenstone Belt [4]. In the Kiannanniemi area, there apparently are Palaeoproterozoic dolerite dykes of three ages, all clearly postdating gold mineralisation [7]. | |||||
| Regional geol map 1 |
|
Outcrop photo 1 | ||||
| Regional geol map 2 |
|
Outcrop photo 2 | ||||
| Local geology map 1 |
|
Outcrop photo 3 | ||||
| Local geology map 2 |
|
|||||
| METAMORPHISM | ||||||
| Metamorphic history | ||||||
| Metamorphic grade | Lower-amphibolite facies [1,3] or upper-greenschist facies [8]. | |||||
| Metamorphic mineral assemblages | Mafic volcanic rock: plagioclase-hornblende-titanite-K feldspar ± quartz, ilmenite, zircon, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite [10]. | |||||
| Metamorph photo 1 |
|
Metamorph photo 2 | ||||
| STRUCTURE | ||||||
| Structural style | Ductile [4], ductile-brittle [10]. | |||||
| Closest major shear | ||||||
| Controlling structure | The mineralisation is within a second-order D3 or D4 fault or shear zone [1], apparently parallel to the strike and dip of the lithological units [4,8] or cuttig them in a low angle [10]. | |||||
| Deformation history | At least, four deformation stages during the late Archaean and two deformation stages during the Palaeoproterozoic time detected in the area [1,3]. NW- and SW-trending shear zones and joints cut the axial plane foliation and the mineralized zones - these may be associated with emplacement of Proterozoic dolerite dikes [5]. Age of D2 is probably 2820±15 Ma [7] or 2843±18 Ma [10]. Syn-D3 granodiorite suggests an age of ca. 2718 Ma for the D3 stage [7]. | |||||
| Ore fabric | ||||||
| Veins | Quartz veins 1 cm to 1 m thick [1,4,7]. | |||||
| Structure photo 1 |
|
Vein photo 1 | ||||
| Structure photo 2 | Vein photo 2 | |||||
| Structure photo 3 | Vein photo3 | |||||
| ALTERATION | ||||||
| General alteration | Formation of biotite-rich and granet-biotite rich mineral assemblages [1]. The obvious alteration halo charcterised by biotite+quartz is 10–30 m wide [4]. To the west, the proximal alteration grades into granet-biotite alteration (reflecying a change in primary rock type?) [4,7]. | |||||
| Proximal alteration | Metabasalt: quartz-biotite-calcite-ankerite-titanite [1,4,10]. | |||||
| Intermediate alteration | ||||||
| Distal alteration | Tuff or tuffite:
granet-biotite-plagioclase-quartz-chlorite [1,4,8]; unclear if the garnet is at all a product of
alteration [8].
Mafic volcanic rock: quartz-biotite-chlorite-epidote partially replace the primary assemblage [10]. |
|||||
| Zonation figure | Prox alteration photo 1 | |||||
| Alteration photo 1 |
|
Prox alteration photo 2 | ||||
| Alteration photo 2 |
|
Intermed alteration photo | ||||
| Alteration photo 3 |
|
Distal alteration photo1 | ||||
| Post-mineralisation modifications | Possibly, a retrograde overprint at greenschist-facies PT conditions [3], also suggested by the late formation of chlorite and epidote [4]. In addition, formation of NW- and SW-trending shear zones, possibly during the Proterozoic [4]. Weak retrograde overprint, D5 deformation with barren quartz-epidote veins | |||||
| TIMING | Syn- or slightly post-peak metamorphic [1], syn-D3 to D4 [10]. | |||||
| GENETIC MODEL | Formed soon(?) after the peak metamorphic event under slightly retrograde conditions near the ductile-brittle transition. An orogenic "mesothermal" deposit with a distinct structural control and having formed under amphibolite-facies conditions [4,10], formed during late-Archaean cratonisation [6]. | |||||
| GENETIC TYPE | Orogenic | References | [1,4,6,10] | |||
| Alternative genetic type 1 | References | |||||
| Alternative genetic type 2 | References | |||||
|
References 1. Halkoaho, T. & Pietikäinen, K. 1999. Ni and Au prospects of the Kuhmo and Suomussalmi greenstone belts. In: H. Papunen & P. Eilu (eds.) Geodynamic Evolution and Metallogeny of the Central Lapland, Kuhmo and Suomussalmi Greenstone Belts, Finland. University of Turku, Inst. Geol. Mineral. Publ. 42, 60–63.2. Poutiainen, M. & Luukkonen, E. 1994. The geology and fluid inclusion studies of some epigenetic gold deposits in the Archean Kuhmo and Suomussalmi greenstone belts, eastern Finland. In: M. G. Izquierdo, A. M. C. Suarez, G. M. Guevara, D. Vanko & G. J. C. Viaggio (eds) Fifth Biennial Pan-American Conference on Research on Fluid Inclusions, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, May 19–21, 1994. Abstracts, 77–78. 3. Luukkonen, E. 1992. Late Archaean and Early Proterozoic structural evolution in the Kuhmo-Suomussalmi Terrain, eastern Finland. Annales universitatis Turkuensis. Ser. A. II 78, 1–37. 4. Pietikäinen, K., Hartikainen, A., Niskanen, M. & Tenhola, M. 2001. The gold prospects; Kuikka, Syrjälä N, Syrjälä S and Tupakkiloma in Kiannanniemi, Suomussalmi, Eastern Finland. www.gtk.fi/explor/tender/Kuikka/kuikka.htm 5. Heino, T. 2000. Mineral Resource Assessment of the Kuikkapuro 1 (mine reg. no. 6748/1), Kuikkapuro 2 (no. 6841/1), Kuikkapuro 3 (no. 6880/1), Kuikkapuro 4 (no. 6880/2) and Kuikkapuro 5 (no. 6912/1) gold mineralizations. Associated with the Geol. Surv. Finland, Report CM06/4511/2000/1. 6. Papunen, H., Halkoaho, T., Liimatainen, J. & Luukkonen, E. 2001. Metallogeny of the Archaean Tipasjärvi-Kuhmo-Suomussalmi greenstone belt, Finland. AGSO – Geoscience Australia, Record 2001/37, 456–458. 7. Luukkonen, E., Halkoaho, T., Hartikainen, A., Heino, T., Niskanen, M., Pietikäinen, K. & Tenhola, M. 2002. Itä-Suomen arkeeiset alueet -hankkeen (12201 ja 210 5000) toiminta vuosina 1992–2001 Suomussalmen, Hyrynsalmen, Kuhmon, Nurmeksen, Rautavaaran, Valtimon, Lieksan, Ilomantsin, Kiihtelysvaaran, Enon, Kontiolahden, Tohmajärven ja Tuupovaaran alueella. Geol. Surv. Finland, Report M19/4513/2002/1. 265 p. (in Finnish, 130 MB) 8. Ojala, J. 2006. Personal communication 16 May 2006. 9. Goode, K. 2004. Dragon Mining NL (DRA) – Bringing Scandinavian Gold Mines into Production. 12 p. (938 KB) 10. Sorjonen-Ward, P. & Luukkonen, E.J. 2005. Archean rocks. In: Precambrian Geology of Finland – Key to the Evolution of The Fennoscandian Shield. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 19–9 9. 11. Saarela, P. 2005. Kullan esiintymistä kontrolloivat rakennegeologiset tekijät Suomussalmen Kuikkapurolla. MSc thesis. Dept of Geosciences, Univ. of Oulu. 53 p. (in Finnish) |
||||||
|
|
|
|||||

